Something to ponder.
The media and public health officials maintained that vaccines, masks, and social distancing are essential in protecting us from contracting the virus....at the same time public health officials are procuring organs from covid positive organ donors, who died from covid and transplanting them into covid negative recipients.
So... I can have the kidney of a person who died from covid transplanted into me but I need to wear a mask in the grocery store? My mind is blown. Maybe the person was sick so long that the virus was gone and they died of cytokine storm and somehow they suffered no organ damage to any organ but the lungs?
Some will argue....."Covid only damages the lungs." That's certainly not what we've been told for 2 years. My understanding is that severe covid illness causes issues in every organ system in the body. Organs lose ability to function properly via tiny blood clots and serious imbalances in blood oxygen levels, pH, high lactic acid, high ferritin, high d-dimer, impairment of bone marrow, resulting in damage to all organ systems... liver, kidneys, heart etc. Also a study just came out showing that sars-cov-2 can linger in the organs for months after the disease.
Covid lingers in body for up to 230 days even in mildly symptomatic patients.
How is it that organs removed from patients who died of covid19 are healthy enough for donation and show NO signs of the virus? Also, after transplant, recipients test negative for covid....what kind of magic is this? Seriously, if you have an explanation I want to hear it.
The kidneys filter every drop of blood in the body...yet no sars-cov-2 in there? But going to the grocery store without a mask is gonna kill me? NONE of this makes sense. My mind is blown.
Dr Mandeep Mehra (the author of the fake surgisphere study on hydroxychloroquine that had to be retracted) has written articles on how the opioid crisis has been great for organ donations. (Maybe that's why we don't stop drugs at the southern border?) He has also written papers on harvesting organs from patients who die and test positive for hepatitis. If, after transplant, the organ recipient tests positive for hepatitis, they just give him one of Gilead Sciences $50k-$90k hepatitis cures. (You remember Gilead ...makers of remdesivir.)
Mandeep Mehra harvesting those organs!
Now the discussion has progressed to talk of taking organ donations from HIV positive patients and transplanting them into HIV negative recipients because "we have treatments for HIV." (Treatments sold by Gilead Sciences but I'm sure that isn't a factor.) Nothing fishy going on there.
We currently have authorization to transplant organs from donors with HIV to recipients with HIV which makes perfect sense. People with HIV can live long lives with proper treatment and shouldn't be excluded from receiving transplants. This also makes good use of organs from HIV+ donors.
But intentionally transplanting organs from an HIV + donor to an HIV - recipient seems unwise. (Maybe it will be ok because Dr Grady- wife of Dr Fauci, is involved in helping sort through the ethical complexities. 😲😳)
The person who receives the donor organ will have to be on immunosuppressive drugs for the rest of his life to prevent organ rejection. If he contracts HIV from the donor organ he now has a disease which causes pathological immune system suppression. I can't imagine the complexities of managing a patient with an organ transplant who has to take immunosuppressive drugs to avoid rejecting the transplanted organ, and who now also has a disease that can cause lethal immune suppression and requires a cocktail of drugs to PREVENT immune suppression.
Oh and the commission that oversees organ procurement and transplants in the USA is proposing a move from having potential organ recipients sign a consent stating they understand the risks of receiving an organ from a donor who was known to have a particular infectious disease, to a form that simply states there is always a risk of contracting a disease from a donated organ. Yes of course there is always that risk. But I think the recipient has a right to know if that risk is statistically ASSURED because the transplant team KNOWS the donor was positive for an infectious disease.
This doesn't meet legal muster for INFORMED consent.
Of course it's clear that our rights aren't being considered much at all these days.
I'm happy that people got the kidneys they needed from the covid patient who didn't have to die and merely succumb because he was denied early meaningful treatment...but I'd sure like someone to explain to me how having an organ once owned by a person sick enough to die from covid, transplanted into my body...results in no infection? I can't imagine how that's possible. I wonder if the recipients still need to wear masks to the grocery store?
And, to top it off with more sinister craziness, some people are denied transplants if they don't have the jab.
We are awakening to the fact that everything - all levels of government, the justice system, big pharma, big tech, big business, religion, and even healthcare providers - is corrupt to the core and has been lying to us about almost everything for a long time.
But this Great Awakening that is happening now, I believe, will bring a new, brighter and enlightened age. The Light is coming!
Spot on!